Grad School

Doctoral study in Information

The academic half of the work, on a page of its own: the direction I am reading toward, the questions driving it, and the projects that sit closest to them.

Direction

The question I keep coming back to is the one the engineering work puts in front of me every week. An employer and a worker are in a data relation with each other, that relation is assembled out of perfectly ordinary infrastructure — directory services, endpoint agents, access logs, hardening baselines, ticket queues — and almost nobody on either side of it can see its shape.

I have spent about fifteen years building that infrastructure. It is an unusual vantage on the subject, and it is most of why I want to study it rather than only run it: I know what these systems actually collect, how the evidence they produce is made, and how far a documented behaviour can drift from the running one.

My BA is in Communication, from UC San Diego in 2023 — a 4.0, summa cum laude, with coursework mostly on how digital technology and surveillance shape social life. Doctoral study in Information is where the two halves meet: close enough to the technical detail to be accurate about it, far enough out to ask what the detail is doing to people.

Research interests

  1. Workplace surveillance

    Workplace surveillance and the data relation between employers and workers

  2. Privacy and data governance

    Privacy policy, data governance and how regulation meets technical reality

  3. Algorithmic bias

    Algorithmic bias in automated evaluation and labor-management systems

  4. Measurement validity

    Measurement validity — whether a metric measures what it claims to measure

Questions

  • What does a workplace monitoring system actually measure, as against what its documentation says it measures?
  • Where does a hardening baseline stop being security and start being surveillance? Both are assembled out of the same telemetry.
  • How much of the data relation they are in can a worker see, and what would it take to make it legible to them?
  • When an automated evaluation gets someone wrong, who is in a position to find out?

Selected work

  • Cross-Modal Instrument

    A research prototype asking whether perceptually meaningful concepts can act as a shared vocabulary for sound and moving image. It processes live audio and video in real time under a small set of common controls, routes between the two explicitly rather than magically, and records what a performer actually does with it.

  • GSI Posting Watcher

    A watcher for graduate-instructor postings: it polls a university career-interest page and a departmental open-postings site on a schedule, normalizes what it finds into stable keys so the same listing is recognized across runs, and emails only genuinely new ones. A small web application around that loop — a results table, notification settings, and an admin-token-protected manual refresh.

All software

Collaboration

Open to research conversations, reading recommendations, and anyone working on the same material from the policy, labor or measurement side. Based in San Diego, California.